Your first workflow

This example shows the pattern most teams end up using first: analyze, implement, validate, then review.

Example

harness: claude-cli
model: sonnet

steps:
  - name: analyze
    prompt: |
      Inspect @src/flightpath/ and identify the highest-risk
      maintainability issue in this module.

  - name: implement
    resumeSession: true
    prompt: |
      Fix the issue you identified. Keep the change focused and update
      any directly related tests or docs.
    endCondition:
      script: npm test
      returns: "0"
      compareSource: exitCode
      maxRetries: 2
      retryPrompt: |
        The validation step failed.
        stdout:
        {stdout}

        stderr:
        {stderr}

        Fix the remaining issues and try again.

finalStep:
  name: review
  prompt: |
    Review the completed change for edge cases, missing docs,
    and obvious follow-up tasks.

Why this structure works

• analyze creates the plan inside the harness conversation
• implement continues that same conversation with resumeSession: true
• the end condition stops the workflow from moving on unless the project state passes
• finalStep gives you one last pass without mixing the review prompt into the main queue

Tips

1. Start with two or three steps, not ten.
2. Add validation before you add complexity.
3. Keep the harness fixed while you learn a workflow pattern.
4. Use name on important steps so the dashboard is easier to scan.

After the first run

Open the working file under .flightpath/.queue/ if you want to inspect persisted runtime metadata such as the resolved harness, model, session ID, and timestamps.